[ARGE] Paddelboot vs. [Tut] Jin1989
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[ARGE] Paddelboot
- Total result
- +559,808,589
23,403,000 units lost
Defender
[Tut] Jin1989
- Total result
- −908,841,589
558,362,000 units lost
Total results include 2 follow-ups · 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 581,765,000
- Loot
- 267,032,068
- Debris field
- 232,706,000
- Rounds
- 3
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +255,682,392 | −431,536,392 |
| Crystal | +160,455,320 | −324,877,320 |
| Deuterium | +143,670,877 | −152,427,877 |
| Total | +559,808,589 | −908,841,589 |
| Honour points | +25,761 | +4,288 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −23,403,000 | −558,362,000 |
| Loot | +267,032,068 | −267,032,068 |
| 2 follow-ups | +83,447,521 | −83,447,521 |
| 1 harvest report | +232,732,000 | |
| Total result | +559,808,589 | −908,841,589 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (75%) | 117,780,108 | 43,006,720 | 106,245,240 | 267,032,068 |
| Debris field | 117,236,000 | 109,632,000 | 5,838,000 | 232,706,000 |
| Harvested | 117,236,000 | 109,658,000 | 5,838,000 | 232,732,000 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Follow-up 1 | +66,758,017 | −66,758,017 |
| Follow-up 2 | +16,689,504 | −16,689,504 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 117,236,000 | 109,658,000 | 5,838,000 | 232,732,000 |
Fleets
Attacker · [ARGE] Paddelboot
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 150,000 | −807 |
Defender · [Tut] Jin1989 destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 46,010 | −46,010 |
| Large Cargo | 14,607 | −14,607 |
| Light Fighter | 1,157 | −1,157 |
| Heavy Fighter | 3,854 | −3,854 |
| Cruiser | 295 | −295 |
| Battleship | 441 | −441 |
| Recycler | 39 | −39 |
| Espionage Probe | 26,777 | −26,777 |
| Bomber | 118 | −118 |
| Destroyer | 71 | −71 |
| Deathstar | 4 | −4 |
| Battlecruiser | 170 | −170 |
| Reaper | 98 | −98 |
| Pathfinder | 121 | −121 |
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.