[GWHC] Lucky Luke vs. Bararaq
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[GWHC] Lucky Luke
- Total result
- +58,313,500
1,370,000 units lost
Defender
Bararaq
- Total result
- −179,641,700
172,365,000 units lost
Total results include 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 173,735,000
- Loot
- 13,124,700
- Debris field
- 46,558,800
- Rounds
- 2
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +36,453,367 | −108,079,367 |
| Crystal | +21,087,954 | −60,737,154 |
| Deuterium | +772,179 | −10,825,179 |
| Total | +58,313,500 | −179,641,700 |
| Honour points | −18,202 | +333 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −1,370,000 | −172,365,000 |
| Loot | +13,124,700 | −13,124,700 |
| Repaired defence | +5,848,000 | |
| 1 harvest report | +46,558,800 | |
| Total result | +58,313,500 | −179,641,700 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 7,092,367 | 5,050,154 | 982,179 | 13,124,700 |
| Debris field | 29,916,000 | 16,642,800 | 46,558,800 | |
| Harvested | 29,916,000 | 16,642,800 | 46,558,800 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 29,916,000 | 16,642,800 | 46,558,800 |
Fleets
Attacker · [GWHC] Lucky Luke
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 1,873 | −3 |
| Battlecruiser | 28,595 | −14 |
Defender · Bararaq destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 423 | −423 |
| Large Cargo | 1,724 | −1,724 |
| Light Fighter | 629 | −629 |
| Heavy Fighter | 163 | −163 |
| Cruiser | 1,616 | −1,616 |
| Battleship | 612 | −612 |
| Recycler | 1,332 | −1,332 |
| Espionage Probe | 3,531 | −3,531 |
| Bomber | 49 | −49 |
| Destroyer | 116 | −116 |
| Battlecruiser | 84 | −84 |
| Rocket Launcher | 950 | −950 |
| Light Laser | 780 | −780 |
| Heavy Laser | 95 | −95 |
| Gauss Cannon | 44 | −44 |
| Plasma Turret | 21 | −21 |
| Small Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
| Large Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
713 Rocket Launcher, 468 Light Laser, 60 Heavy Laser, 28 Gauss Cannon, 15 Plasma Turret, 1 Small Shield Dome could be repaired.
Main comment