[Ue30] Hardeddy vs. [AMV1] Fleetcrasher
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[Ue30] Hardeddy
- Total result
- +161,773
1,000 units lost
Defender
[AMV1] Fleetcrasher
- Total result
- −591,873
943,000 units lost
Total results include 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 944,000
- Loot
- 8,873
- Debris field
- 153,600
- Moon chance
- 2%
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +100,334 | −391,034 |
| Crystal | +56,781 | −190,181 |
| Deuterium | +4,658 | −10,658 |
| Total | +161,773 | −591,873 |
| Honour points | +132 | 0 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −1,000 | −943,000 |
| Loot | +8,873 | −8,873 |
| Repaired defence | +360,000 | |
| 1 harvest report | +153,900 | |
| Total result | +161,773 | −591,873 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (75%) | 2,534 | 1,681 | 4,658 | 8,873 |
| Debris field | 97,800 | 55,800 | 153,600 | |
| Harvested | 97,800 | 56,100 | 153,900 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 97,800 | 56,100 | 153,900 |
Fleets
Attacker · [Ue30] Hardeddy
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 70 | 0 |
| Battleship | 2 | 0 |
| Espionage Probe | 1 | −1 |
2 fleets
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 1
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 70 | 70 | 0 |
| Battleship | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 2 destroyed
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Espionage Probe | 1 | 0 | −1 |
Defender · [AMV1] Fleetcrasher destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cargo | 1 | −1 |
| Light Fighter | 76 | −76 |
| Heavy Fighter | 12 | −12 |
| Recycler | 2 | −2 |
| Espionage Probe | 35 | −35 |
| Solar Satellite | 4 | −4 |
| Rocket Launcher | 152 | −152 |
| Light Laser | 37 | −37 |
| Heavy Laser | 1 | −1 |
| Ion Cannon | 5 | −5 |
126 Rocket Launcher, 30 Light Laser, 5 Ion Cannon, 1 Heavy Laser could be repaired.
All 3 rounds in detail
Round 1 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 289 | 327 |
| Firepower | 197,880 | 38,366 |
| Absorbed by shields | 6,532 | 6,971 |
Attacker
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 70 | 0 |
| Battleship | 2 | 0 |
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 2 destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −1 |
Defender
Fleetcrasher [AMV1]
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cargo | 1 | 0 |
| Light Fighter | 33 | −43 |
| Heavy Fighter | 11 | −1 |
| Recycler | 2 | 0 |
| Espionage Probe | 15 | −20 |
| Solar Satellite | 3 | −1 |
| Rocket Launcher | 58 | −94 |
| Light Laser | 15 | −22 |
| Heavy Laser | 1 | 0 |
| Ion Cannon | 4 | −1 |
Round 2 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 187 | 143 |
| Firepower | 131,240 | 17,506 |
| Absorbed by shields | 5,171 | 5,731 |
Attacker
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 70 | 0 |
| Battleship | 2 | 0 |
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 2 destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −1 |
Defender
Fleetcrasher [AMV1]
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cargo | 0 | −1 |
| Light Fighter | 9 | −67 |
| Heavy Fighter | 4 | −8 |
| Recycler | 0 | −2 |
| Espionage Probe | 2 | −33 |
| Solar Satellite | 1 | −3 |
| Rocket Launcher | 16 | −136 |
| Light Laser | 1 | −36 |
| Heavy Laser | 1 | 0 |
| Ion Cannon | 3 | −2 |
Round 3 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 181 | 37 |
| Firepower | 125,120 | 5,322 |
| Absorbed by shields | 2,452 | 3,661 |
Attacker
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 70 | 0 |
| Battleship | 2 | 0 |
Hardeddy [Ue30] · fleet 2 destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −1 |
Defender
Fleetcrasher [AMV1] destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cargo | 0 | −1 |
| Light Fighter | 0 | −76 |
| Heavy Fighter | 0 | −12 |
| Recycler | 0 | −2 |
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −35 |
| Solar Satellite | 0 | −4 |
| Rocket Launcher | 0 | −152 |
| Light Laser | 0 | −37 |
| Heavy Laser | 0 | −1 |
| Ion Cannon | 0 | −5 |
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.