escd vs. paabeatz
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
escd
- Total result
- +622,322
504,000 units lost
Defender
paabeatz
- Total result
- −3,023,322
2,737,000 units lost
Total results include 2 harvest reports
- Units destroyed
- 3,241,000
- Loot
- 286,322
- Debris field
- 943,500
- Moon chance
- 9%
- Rounds
- 3
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +290,294 | −1,939,694 |
| Crystal | +218,729 | −874,329 |
| Deuterium | +113,299 | −209,299 |
| Total | +622,322 | −3,023,322 |
| Honour points | −552 | +113 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −504,000 | −2,737,000 |
| Loot | +286,322 | −286,322 |
| 2 harvest reports | +840,000 | |
| Total result | +622,322 | −3,023,322 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 45,694 | 111,329 | 129,299 | 286,322 |
| Debris field | 662,400 | 281,100 | 943,500 | |
| Harvested | 558,600 | 281,400 | 840,000 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 170,000 | 170,000 | 340,000 | |
| Harvest report 2 | 388,600 | 111,400 | 500,000 |
Fleets
Attacker · escd
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 62 | −23 |
| Heavy Fighter | 62 | −18 |
| Cruiser | 137 | −8 |
| Battleship | 25 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 10 | 0 |
2 fleets
escd · fleet 1
Weapons 80% · Shields 80% · Armour 80%
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 62 | 39 | −23 |
| Heavy Fighter | 36 | 24 | −12 |
| Cruiser | 113 | 105 | −8 |
| Battleship | 11 | 11 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 10 | 10 | 0 |
escd · fleet 2
Weapons 80% · Shields 80% · Armour 80%
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heavy Fighter | 26 | 20 | −6 |
| Cruiser | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| Battleship | 14 | 14 | 0 |
Defender · paabeatz destroyed
Weapons 90% · Shields 80% · Armour 80%
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 19 | −19 |
| Large Cargo | 21 | −21 |
| Light Fighter | 25 | −25 |
| Cruiser | 40 | −40 |
| Battleship | 19 | −19 |
| Espionage Probe | 9 | −9 |
All 3 rounds in detail
Round 1 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 364 | 133 |
| Firepower | 221,625 | 69,235 |
| Absorbed by shields | 7,238 | 11,347 |
Attacker
escd · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 53 | −9 |
| Heavy Fighter | 30 | −6 |
| Cruiser | 109 | −4 |
| Battleship | 11 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 10 | 0 |
escd · fleet 2
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy Fighter | 23 | −3 |
| Cruiser | 24 | 0 |
| Battleship | 14 | 0 |
Defender
paabeatz
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 3 | −16 |
| Large Cargo | 4 | −17 |
| Light Fighter | 2 | −23 |
| Cruiser | 32 | −8 |
| Battleship | 19 | 0 |
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −9 |
Round 2 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 315 | 60 |
| Firepower | 215,757 | 60,673 |
| Absorbed by shields | 5,517 | 10,016 |
Attacker
escd · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 43 | −19 |
| Heavy Fighter | 25 | −11 |
| Cruiser | 106 | −7 |
| Battleship | 11 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 10 | 0 |
escd · fleet 2
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy Fighter | 21 | −5 |
| Cruiser | 24 | 0 |
| Battleship | 14 | 0 |
Defender
paabeatz
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 0 | −19 |
| Large Cargo | 0 | −21 |
| Light Fighter | 0 | −25 |
| Cruiser | 7 | −33 |
| Battleship | 9 | −10 |
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −9 |
Round 3 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 319 | 16 |
| Firepower | 245,907 | 22,420 |
| Absorbed by shields | 1,872 | 3,910 |
Attacker
escd · fleet 1
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 39 | −23 |
| Heavy Fighter | 24 | −12 |
| Cruiser | 105 | −8 |
| Battleship | 11 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 10 | 0 |
escd · fleet 2
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy Fighter | 20 | −6 |
| Cruiser | 24 | 0 |
| Battleship | 14 | 0 |
Defender
paabeatz destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 0 | −19 |
| Large Cargo | 0 | −21 |
| Light Fighter | 0 | −25 |
| Cruiser | 0 | −40 |
| Battleship | 0 | −19 |
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −9 |
Main comment