[GEZ] Chief Phobos vs. [BaeO] Schmierlappen
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[GEZ] Chief Phobos
- Total result
- +3,089,260
1,077,000 units lost
Defender
[BaeO] Schmierlappen
- Total result
- −5,158,660
5,243,000 units lost
Total results include 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 6,320,000
- Loot
- 156,660
- Debris field
- 4,009,600
- Moon chance
- 21%
- Rounds
- 4
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +2,162,205 | −3,462,505 |
| Crystal | +880,335 | −1,392,435 |
| Deuterium | +46,720 | −303,720 |
| Total | +3,089,260 | −5,158,660 |
| Honour points | −997 | +268 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −1,077,000 | −5,243,000 |
| Loot | +156,660 | −156,660 |
| Repaired defence | +241,000 | |
| 1 harvest report | +4,009,600 | |
| Total result | +3,089,260 | −5,158,660 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 13,505 | 30,435 | 112,720 | 156,660 |
| Debris field | 2,898,700 | 1,110,900 | 4,009,600 | |
| Harvested | 2,898,700 | 1,110,900 | 4,009,600 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 2,898,700 | 1,110,900 | 4,009,600 |
Fleets
Attacker · [GEZ] Chief Phobos
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 100 | −33 |
| Battleship | 30 | −2 |
| Battlecruiser | 54 | 0 |
2 fleets
Chief Phobos [GEZ] · fleet 1
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 30 | 28 | −2 |
| Battlecruiser | 54 | 54 | 0 |
Chief Phobos [GEZ] · fleet 2
| Type | Before | After | Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 100 | 67 | −33 |
Defender · [BaeO] Schmierlappen destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 43 | −43 |
| Large Cargo | 15 | −15 |
| Light Fighter | 85 | −85 |
| Cruiser | 40 | −40 |
| Battleship | 40 | −40 |
| Recycler | 1 | −1 |
| Espionage Probe | 4 | −4 |
| Bomber | 7 | −7 |
| Heavy Laser | 9 | −9 |
| Gauss Cannon | 7 | −7 |
| Ion Cannon | 1 | −1 |
6 Heavy Laser, 5 Gauss Cannon, 1 Ion Cannon could be repaired.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.