[PFR] Gamble vs. [BBM] Sanchero
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[PFR] Gamble
- Total result
- +48,717,135
66,294,000 units lost
Defender
[BBM] Sanchero
- Total result
- −140,242,435
178,606,000 units lost
- Units destroyed
- 244,900,000
- Loot
- 5,061,435
- Debris field
- 109,949,700
- Rounds
- 5
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +25,417,910 | −74,181,910 |
| Crystal | +27,631,031 | −57,193,331 |
| Deuterium | −4,331,806 | −8,867,194 |
| Total | +48,717,135 | −140,242,435 |
| Honour points | −16,361 | +10,947 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −66,294,000 | −178,606,000 |
| Loot | +5,061,435 | −5,061,435 |
| Repaired defence | +43,425,000 | |
| Missing debris | +109,949,700 | |
| Total result | +48,717,135 | −140,242,435 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 4,648,910 | 172,331 | 240,194 | 5,061,435 |
| Debris field | 66,489,000 | 43,460,700 | 109,949,700 |
Fleets
Attacker · [PFR] Gamble
Weapons 140% · Shields 130% · Armour 140%
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 10,000 | −2,286 |
Defender · [BBM] Sanchero destroyed
Weapons 120% · Shields 120% · Armour 100%
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 1,765 | −1,765 |
| Large Cargo | 947 | −947 |
| Light Fighter | 2,977 | −2,977 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2,140 | −2,140 |
| Cruiser | 578 | −578 |
| Battleship | 153 | −153 |
| Espionage Probe | 12,659 | −12,659 |
| Bomber | 3 | −3 |
| Solar Satellite | 200 | −200 |
| Destroyer | 55 | −55 |
| Battlecruiser | 81 | −81 |
| Reaper | 3 | −3 |
| Pathfinder | 633 | −633 |
| Rocket Launcher | 17,500 | −17,500 |
| Light Laser | 3,200 | −3,200 |
| Heavy Laser | 500 | −500 |
| Gauss Cannon | 100 | −100 |
| Ion Cannon | 65 | −65 |
| Plasma Turret | 30 | −30 |
| Small Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
| Large Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
14,175 Rocket Launcher, 2,656 Light Laser, 375 Heavy Laser, 79 Gauss Cannon, 55 Ion Cannon, 26 Plasma Turret, 1 Small Shield Dome could be repaired.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.