Skip to content
OGMem
Login

Diggaschigga vs. Mouthfull

OGame.de Japetus 12/07/2016 19:25 2 comments

The attacker won the battle.

Attacker

Diggaschigga

Total result
+229,664,659

105,230,000 units lost

Defender

Mouthfull

Total result
−391,987,259

305,190,000 units lost

Total results include 3 follow-ups · 1 harvest report

Units destroyed
410,420,000
Loot
18,856,500
Debris field
244,855,100
Rounds
3
Details
Total result by resource
Attacker Defender
Metal +145,912,669 −215,164,069
Crystal +73,850,565 −125,972,765
Deuterium +9,901,425 −50,850,425
Total +229,664,659 −391,987,259
Honour points −37,631 +16,593
How the total result adds up
Attacker Defender
Battle losses −105,230,000 −305,190,000
Loot +18,856,500 −18,856,500
Repaired defence +12,498,000
3 follow-ups +68,782,759 −80,438,759
1 harvest report +247,255,400
Total result +229,664,659 −391,987,259
Loot and debris field
Metal Crystal Deuterium Total
Loot (50%) 6,285,500 4,248,408 8,322,592 18,856,500
Debris field 128,947,000 115,908,100 244,855,100
Harvested 130,142,600 117,112,800 247,255,400
Follow-ups
Attacker Defender
Follow-up 1 +39,244,434 −45,432,434
Follow-up 2 +19,636,216 −22,998,216
Follow-up 3 +9,902,109 −12,008,109
Harvest reports
Metal Crystal Deuterium Total
Harvest report 1 130,142,600 117,112,800 247,255,400

Fleets

Attacker · Diggaschigga

Type Before Lost
Battlecruiser 26,380 −1,238

Defender · Mouthfull destroyed

Type Before Lost
Small Cargo 1,231 −1,231
Large Cargo 3,089 −3,089
Light Fighter 4,801 −4,801
Heavy Fighter 6 −6
Cruiser 1 −1
Battleship 3 −3
Colony Ship 5 −5
Recycler 126 −126
Espionage Probe 1,149 −1,149
Bomber 1 −1
Deathstar 22 −22
Battlecruiser 4 −4
Rocket Launcher 4,839 −4,839
Light Laser 5,000 −5,000

3,049 Rocket Launcher, 3,200 Light Laser could be repaired.

All 3 rounds in detail

Round 1 of 3
Attacker Defender
Shots 32,509 20,531
Firepower 59,166,380 135,257,340
Absorbed by shields 3,008,452 742,718

Attacker

Diggaschigga

Type Units Lost
Battlecruiser 26,108 −272

Defender

Mouthfull

Type Units Lost
Small Cargo 256 −975
Large Cargo 978 −2,111
Light Fighter 973 −3,828
Heavy Fighter 3 −3
Cruiser 0 −1
Battleship 2 −1
Colony Ship 3 −2
Recycler 55 −71
Espionage Probe 236 −913
Bomber 1 0
Deathstar 22 0
Battlecruiser 4 0
Rocket Launcher 940 −3,899
Light Laser 1,010 −3,990
Round 2 of 3
Attacker Defender
Shots 33,818 4,888
Firepower 61,548,760 205,529,918
Absorbed by shields 973,070 460,623

Attacker

Diggaschigga

Type Units Lost
Battlecruiser 25,685 −695

Defender

Mouthfull

Type Units Lost
Small Cargo 0 −1,231
Large Cargo 2 −3,087
Light Fighter 1 −4,800
Heavy Fighter 0 −6
Cruiser 0 −1
Battleship 0 −3
Colony Ship 0 −5
Recycler 0 −126
Espionage Probe 0 −1,149
Bomber 0 −1
Deathstar 22 0
Battlecruiser 0 −4
Rocket Launcher 0 −4,839
Light Laser 0 −5,000
Round 3 of 3
Attacker Defender
Shots 27,093 551
Firepower 49,309,260 263,040,144
Absorbed by shields 543,134 3,989,399

Attacker

Diggaschigga

Type Units Lost
Battlecruiser 25,142 −1,238

Defender

Mouthfull destroyed

Type Units Lost
Small Cargo 0 −1,231
Large Cargo 0 −3,089
Light Fighter 0 −4,801
Heavy Fighter 0 −6
Cruiser 0 −1
Battleship 0 −3
Colony Ship 0 −5
Recycler 0 −126
Espionage Probe 0 −1,149
Bomber 0 −1
Deathstar 0 −22
Battlecruiser 0 −4
Rocket Launcher 0 −4,839
Light Laser 0 −5,000

Main comment

Diggaschigga Uploader 12/07/2016 19:29
Suche Deut

Comments

Diggaschigga Uploader 13/07/2016 17:23
ich weis nicht so genau ^^
Trashsim hatte mir auch ein anderes ergebnis angezeigt und hat gesagt ich hätte deutlich weniger verluste
und der kleine unterschied den mir trash sim angezeigt hat im gegensatz zu den zerren war nicht so groß daher hab ich die schnelle variante gewählt 😉
Bullwey 13/07/2016 10:26
gratz

aber warum nicht mit zerren?

Menu

Account
Login Register
Language
English Deutsch Español Polski Svenska Dansk Français
About
Changelog Team Statistics Imprint Privacy policy