[HIDE] Dwight K Schrute vs. [DNO] Replica
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
[HIDE] Dwight K Schrute
- Total result
- +438,110,479
18,415,000 units lost
Defender
[DNO] Replica
- Total result
- −749,062,979
603,510,000 units lost
Total results include 3 follow-ups · 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 621,925,000
- Loot
- 80,408,722
- Debris field
- 310,962,500
- Rounds
- 3
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +207,927,325 | −375,050,825 |
| Crystal | +189,191,406 | −314,700,906 |
| Deuterium | +40,991,748 | −59,311,248 |
| Total | +438,110,479 | −749,062,979 |
| Honour points | −59,455 | +3,456 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −18,415,000 | −603,510,000 |
| Loot | +80,408,722 | −80,408,722 |
| 3 follow-ups | +65,144,257 | −65,144,257 |
| 1 harvest report | +310,972,500 | |
| Total result | +438,110,479 | −749,062,979 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 29,249,429 | 38,390,094 | 12,769,199 | 80,408,722 |
| Debris field | 167,123,500 | 125,519,500 | 18,319,500 | 310,962,500 |
| Harvested | 167,123,500 | 125,529,500 | 18,319,500 | 310,972,500 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Follow-up 1 | +24,956,597 | −24,956,597 |
| Follow-up 2 | +24,923,194 | −24,923,194 |
| Follow-up 3 | +15,264,466 | −15,264,466 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 167,123,500 | 125,529,500 | 18,319,500 | 310,972,500 |
Fleets
Attacker · [HIDE] Dwight K Schrute
| Type | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Cruiser | 80,899 | 80,264 |
Defender · [DNO] Replica destroyed
| Type | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 11,693 | 0 |
| Large Cargo | 7,295 | 0 |
| Light Fighter | 20,342 | 0 |
| Heavy Fighter | 8,827 | 0 |
| Cruiser | 2,201 | 0 |
| Battleship | 1,087 | 0 |
| Colony Ship | 5 | 0 |
| Recycler | 347 | 0 |
| Espionage Probe | 28,254 | 0 |
| Bomber | 114 | 0 |
| Destroyer | 173 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 130 | 0 |
| Pathfinder | 2,996 | 0 |
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.