Lucky Luke vs. PRomo
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
Lucky Luke
- Total result
- +9,504
4,000 units lost
Defender
PRomo
- Total result
- −15,504
8,000 units lost
- Units destroyed
- 12,000
- Loot
- 13,504
- Debris field
- 1,200
- Rounds
- 3
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +5,500 | −9,500 |
| Crystal | +3,185 | −5,185 |
| Deuterium | +819 | −819 |
| Total | +9,504 | −15,504 |
| Honour points | 0 | 0 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −4,000 | −8,000 |
| Loot | +13,504 | −13,504 |
| Repaired defence | +6,000 | |
| Total result | +9,504 | −15,504 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (75%) | 7,500 | 5,185 | 819 | 13,504 |
| Debris field | 600 | 600 | 1,200 |
Fleets
Attacker · Lucky Luke
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 6 | −1 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2 | 0 |
Defender · PRomo destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket Launcher | 4 | −4 |
3 Rocket Launcher could be repaired.
All 3 rounds in detail
Round 1 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8 | 4 |
| Firepower | 330 | 320 |
| Absorbed by shields | 45 | 50 |
Attacker
Lucky Luke
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 6 | 0 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2 | 0 |
Defender
PRomo
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket Launcher | 3 | −1 |
Round 2 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8 | 3 |
| Firepower | 330 | 240 |
| Absorbed by shields | 20 | 50 |
Attacker
Lucky Luke
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 5 | −1 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2 | 0 |
Defender
PRomo
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket Launcher | 1 | −3 |
Round 3 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 7 | 1 |
| Firepower | 325 | 80 |
| Absorbed by shields | 10 | 20 |
Attacker
Lucky Luke
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 5 | −1 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2 | 0 |
Defender
PRomo destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket Launcher | 0 | −4 |
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.