OGMem

Jack vs Integral

Battle in universe OGame.de Oberon!

The following fleets met in battle:
Jack vs. Integral

Attacker Jack

Weapons: 160% Shields: 160% Armour: 150%

Type	Large Cargo	Destroyer
Total	2.000	1.001
Weapons	13	5.200
Shields	65	1.300
Armour	3.000	27.500

Attacker Jack

Weapons: 160% Shields: 160% Armour: 150%

Type	Large Cargo	Bomber
Total	500	2.000
Weapons	13	2.600
Shields	65	1.300
Armour	3.000	18.750

Attacker Jack

Weapons: 160% Shields: 160% Armour: 150%

Type	Cruiser
Total	10.080
Weapons	1.040
Shields	130
Armour	6.750

Attacker Jack

Weapons: 160% Shields: 160% Armour: 150%

Type	Battleship	Battlecruiser
Total	5.001	2.264
Weapons	2.600	1.820
Shields	520	1.040
Armour	15.000	17.500

Attacker Jack

Weapons: 160% Shields: 160% Armour: 150%

Type	Light Fighter
Total	59.758
Weapons	130
Shields	26
Armour	1.000

Defender Integral

Weapons: 160% Shields: 150% Armour: 180%

Type	Large Cargo	Light Fighter	Battleship	Destroyer	Deathstar
Total	2.184	11.071	5	1	43
Weapons	13	130	2.600	5.200	520.000
Shields	63	25	500	1.250	125.000
Armour	3.360	1.120	16.800	30.800	2.520.000

The attacking fleet fires 105.824 times with a total firepower of 70.185.180 at the defender. The defending shields absorb 656.447 damage.
In total, the defending fleet fires 15.543 times with a total firepower of 1.188.125.822 at the attacker. The attackers shields absorb 893.484 damage.

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Destroyer
Total	1.922 (-78)	979 (-22)

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Bomber
Total	491 (-9)	1.944 (-56)

Attacker Jack

Type	Cruiser
Total	9.803 (-277)

Attacker Jack

Type	Battleship	Battlecruiser
Total	4.886 (-115)	2.193 (-71)

Attacker Jack

Type	Light Fighter
Total	58.118 (-1.640)

Defender Integral

Type	Large Cargo	Light Fighter	Battleship	Destroyer	Deathstar
Total	121 (-2.063)	170 (-10.901)	3 (-2)	1	43

The attacking fleet fires 88.323 times with a total firepower of 53.484.509 at the defender. The defending shields absorb 6.921.027 damage.
In total, the defending fleet fires 2.684 times with a total firepower of 1.242.316.673 at the attacker. The attackers shields absorb 352.708 damage.

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Destroyer
Total	1.874 (-126)	955 (-46)

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Bomber
Total	475 (-25)	1.885 (-115)

Attacker Jack

Type	Cruiser
Total	9.512 (-568)

Attacker Jack

Type	Battleship	Battlecruiser
Total	4.726 (-275)	2.131 (-133)

Attacker Jack

Type	Light Fighter
Total	56.426 (-3.332)

Defender Integral

Type	Large Cargo	Light Fighter	Battleship	Destroyer	Deathstar
Total	0 (-2.184)	0 (-11.071)	0 (-5)	0 (-1)	43

The attacking fleet fires 77.984 times with a total firepower of 43.291.417 at the defender. The defending shields absorb 5.613.642 damage.
In total, the defending fleet fires 3.223 times with a total firepower of 1.675.960.000 at the attacker. The attackers shields absorb 460.694 damage.

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Destroyer
Total	1.797 (-203)	916 (-85)

Attacker Jack

Type	Large Cargo	Bomber
Total	452 (-48)	1.812 (-188)

Attacker Jack

Type	Cruiser
Total	9.075 (-1.005)

Attacker Jack

Type	Battleship	Battlecruiser
Total	4.548 (-453)	2.034 (-230)

Attacker Jack

Type	Light Fighter
Total	54.182 (-5.576)

Defender Integral destroyed

Type	Large Cargo	Light Fighter	Battleship	Destroyer	Deathstar
Total	0 (-2.184)	0 (-11.071)	0 (-5)	0 (-1)	0 (-43)

The attacker won the battle! He captured 28.642.992 metal, 5.719.400 crystal and 1.752.599 deuterium.

The attacker lost a total of 128.736.000 units.
The defender lost a total of 500.917.000 units.
At these space coordinates now float 205.032.600 metal and 141.217.200 crystal.

Total result (incl. follow ups and harvest reports)

Attacker		Defender
153.556.592	Metal	-290.244.992
107.897.400	Crystal	-202.019.400
-7.802.401	Deuterium	-44.767.599
253.651.591	Total	-537.031.991
-64.385	Honorpoints	19.474

Follow ups

none available

Harvest reports

205.032.600 metal and 141.240.000 crystal harvested.

Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.

Pinky90 (09.05.2017 23:00):

gratz

Chap (09.05.2017 20:33):

gz und wb

Khronodar (09.05.2017 19:04):

YEE (09.05.2017 18:28):