Broeki vs. 0x00000000
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
Broeki
- Total result
- +7,230,470
3,369,000 units lost
Defender
0x00000000
- Total result
- −16,152,070
21,730,000 units lost
Total results include 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 25,099,000
- Loot
- 791,070
- Debris field
- 9,808,400
- Rounds
- 4
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +4,433,477 | −9,366,477 |
| Crystal | +2,784,581 | −5,338,181 |
| Deuterium | +12,412 | −1,447,412 |
| Total | +7,230,470 | −16,152,070 |
| Honour points | −2,925 | +140 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −3,369,000 | −21,730,000 |
| Loot | +791,070 | −791,070 |
| Repaired defence | +6,369,000 | |
| 1 harvest report | +9,808,400 | |
| Total result | +7,230,470 | −16,152,070 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 435,977 | 252,681 | 102,412 | 791,070 |
| Debris field | 5,659,500 | 4,148,900 | 9,808,400 | |
| Harvested | 5,659,500 | 4,148,900 | 9,808,400 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 5,659,500 | 4,148,900 | 9,808,400 |
Fleets
Attacker · Broeki
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 1,557 | −711 |
| Bomber | 415 | −3 |
| Battlecruiser | 222 | −3 |
Defender · 0x00000000 destroyed
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 1 | −1 |
| Light Fighter | 8 | −8 |
| Heavy Fighter | 2 | −2 |
| Cruiser | 1 | −1 |
| Battleship | 65 | −65 |
| Espionage Probe | 30 | −30 |
| Bomber | 16 | −16 |
| Solar Satellite | 10 | −10 |
| Destroyer | 22 | −22 |
| Battlecruiser | 44 | −44 |
| Rocket Launcher | 1,384 | −1,384 |
| Light Laser | 76 | −76 |
| Heavy Laser | 499 | −499 |
| Gauss Cannon | 24 | −24 |
| Ion Cannon | 35 | −35 |
| Plasma Turret | 12 | −12 |
| Small Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
| Large Shield Dome | 1 | −1 |
927 Rocket Launcher, 51 Light Laser, 299 Heavy Laser, 15 Gauss Cannon, 22 Ion Cannon, 9 Plasma Turret, 1 Small Shield Dome, 1 Large Shield Dome could be repaired.
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.