Gotteskrieger vs. Seeschmie
Result
The attacker won the battle.
Attacker
Gotteskrieger
- Total result
- +46,267,143
1,980,000 units lost
Defender
Seeschmie
- Total result
- −133,802,143
116,215,000 units lost
Total results include 1 follow-up · 1 harvest report
- Units destroyed
- 118,195,000
- Loot
- 8,186,500
- Debris field
- 33,373,500
- Rounds
- 3
Details
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Metal | +21,685,297 | −71,048,197 |
| Crystal | +14,536,182 | −45,758,282 |
| Deuterium | +10,045,664 | −16,995,664 |
| Total | +46,267,143 | −133,802,143 |
| Honour points | −14,044 | +464 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Battle losses | −1,980,000 | −116,215,000 |
| Loot | +8,186,500 | −8,186,500 |
| 1 follow-up | +9,400,643 | −9,400,643 |
| 1 harvest report | +30,660,000 | |
| Total result | +46,267,143 | −133,802,143 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loot (50%) | 2,728,833 | 1,190,188 | 4,267,479 | 8,186,500 |
| Debris field | 19,988,100 | 13,385,400 | 33,373,500 | |
| Harvested | 17,264,100 | 13,395,900 | 30,660,000 |
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Follow-up 1 | +9,400,643 | −9,400,643 |
| Metal | Crystal | Deuterium | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest report 1 | 17,264,100 | 13,395,900 | 30,660,000 |
Fleets
Attacker · Gotteskrieger
Weapons 140% · Shields 120% · Armour 140%
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 2,517 | −21 |
| Destroyer | 1,233 | −1 |
| Battlecruiser | 2,645 | −7 |
Defender · Seeschmie destroyed
Weapons 120% · Shields 120% · Armour 140%
| Type | Before | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 2,366 | −2,366 |
| Large Cargo | 888 | −888 |
| Light Fighter | 220 | −220 |
| Heavy Fighter | 912 | −912 |
| Cruiser | 335 | −335 |
| Battleship | 524 | −524 |
| Colony Ship | 1 | −1 |
| Recycler | 165 | −165 |
| Espionage Probe | 5,655 | −5,655 |
| Bomber | 195 | −195 |
| Destroyer | 58 | −58 |
| Battlecruiser | 135 | −135 |
All 3 rounds in detail
Round 1 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15,365 | 11,537 |
| Firepower | 35,157,600 | 2,868,954 |
| Absorbed by shields | 1,170,804 | 620,706 |
Attacker
Gotteskrieger
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 2,513 | −4 |
| Destroyer | 1,233 | 0 |
| Battlecruiser | 2,645 | 0 |
Defender
Seeschmie
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 624 | −1,742 |
| Large Cargo | 333 | −555 |
| Light Fighter | 58 | −162 |
| Heavy Fighter | 326 | −586 |
| Cruiser | 209 | −126 |
| Battleship | 435 | −89 |
| Colony Ship | 1 | 0 |
| Recycler | 67 | −98 |
| Espionage Probe | 1,457 | −4,198 |
| Bomber | 183 | −12 |
| Destroyer | 56 | −2 |
| Battlecruiser | 128 | −7 |
Round 2 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13,116 | 3,952 |
| Firepower | 30,097,920 | 2,264,451 |
| Absorbed by shields | 847,656 | 618,885 |
Attacker
Gotteskrieger
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 2,503 | −14 |
| Destroyer | 1,232 | −1 |
| Battlecruiser | 2,641 | −4 |
Defender
Seeschmie
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 26 | −2,340 |
| Large Cargo | 23 | −865 |
| Light Fighter | 2 | −218 |
| Heavy Fighter | 18 | −894 |
| Cruiser | 22 | −313 |
| Battleship | 125 | −399 |
| Colony Ship | 0 | −1 |
| Recycler | 6 | −159 |
| Espionage Probe | 44 | −5,611 |
| Bomber | 85 | −110 |
| Destroyer | 36 | −22 |
| Battlecruiser | 61 | −74 |
Round 3 of 3
| Attacker | Defender | |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 9,021 | 500 |
| Firepower | 21,672,720 | 851,951 |
| Absorbed by shields | 292,300 | 247,496 |
Attacker
Gotteskrieger
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Battleship | 2,496 | −21 |
| Destroyer | 1,232 | −1 |
| Battlecruiser | 2,638 | −7 |
Defender
Seeschmie destroyed
| Type | Units | Lost |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cargo | 0 | −2,366 |
| Large Cargo | 0 | −888 |
| Light Fighter | 0 | −220 |
| Heavy Fighter | 0 | −912 |
| Cruiser | 0 | −335 |
| Battleship | 0 | −524 |
| Colony Ship | 0 | −1 |
| Recycler | 0 | −165 |
| Espionage Probe | 0 | −5,655 |
| Bomber | 0 | −195 |
| Destroyer | 0 | −58 |
| Battlecruiser | 0 | −135 |
Comments
Log in to leave a comment. Login
No comments yet — be the first.